Honest Halo 2 Review
A review of Halo 2 that is more in line with how I feel about the game. I agree with the reviewer, I just don't understand why reviewers think this game is a God send. It's almost as if the reviewers were paid off. I simply don't get it. First of all, to give a game a perfect score is like saying this is one of the top games of all time. In my opinion, a sequel cannot be considered as a great achievement simply because of the lack of innovation. It took them 3 years to produce this garbage? Fine, the gameplay is tight, but it's 30 seconds of Halo 1 gameplay repeated over and over and over again. The art? It STILL sucks, because the Art Direction, again, is horrible. Halo 2 is Halo 1 all over again. Just tack on another 10 hours to Halo 1, and you have Halo 2.
I honestly cannot comment on the online ('Live') aspect of the game, but supposeldy it is good, but I would much rather play an online FPS on a PC with a mouse and keyboard.
Curiously, if you read the review, it would seem as if the reviewer would score it much lower than the score of 70 that he ultimately gave it. Well, I guess a 70 is a C, which in my opinion is poor, rather than the largely accepted 'average'.
Quite honsetly, most games bore me these days. What a sad time it is.


































